HashKama: Christmas Nuts and the Revelation of God
What is your favourite nut? Usually, the nuts people go for at Christmas-time are those that are picked around the month of October. By the time Christmas has come some varieties are rather dry and tasteless. Chestnuts are a favourite, along with cobnuts. Walnuts and imported Brazil nuts are also popular. Numb-nuts are so numerous that they are overlooked and often trivialised. If you have the misfortune to crack a numb-nut open you find all kinds of flavourless, odious, indescri-babble, indigestible tripe. These nuts are increasing rapidly, with roots penetrating every sphere of existence. A new discipline known as “Fraudulent Science” is a main incubator and contributing factor to the spread of this nutty pandemic. The love of “fraudulent” science has not grown cold in the wake of global warming. People are cajoled into being dedicated followers of [“the”] science. Then there are the Bureau-nuts. These believe that they rule the world. In the same family-group are the Bureau-cracks – so you can end up with nuts that are cracked.
The love of or for science has replaced love for God; but used as it should be used, science leads one to God. People say, we have science now so we no longer need to believe in myths (that’s their ‘sophisticated’ way of referring to God). Science can answer all of humanity’s questions; science can provide the answers to all of humanity’s problems. Science in the hands of humans is the Saviour of the world. Try presenting a scientific argument against anthropogenic climate change, and you are called nonsensical and dangerous. So, it isn’t exactly that people love science, or that they put their faith in science. They trust what they are told is science. They sell their souls to a rag-tag belief system. They base their whole future and the future of the human race on what they are told is science. The scientific experts say this and that, so this and that must be true. Really? We are living in an age of nutty professors and mad scientists; it is a world of shambolic, unscrupulous so-called scientists who will do anything for money and fame. Richard Dearlove, ex-MI6 chief, has said that Britain’s science sector has been compromised by ‘malign Chinese Communist influence’ and parroted China’s party line…that Covid did NOT leak from a Wuhan lab. Politicians and scientist are leading us all up the garden path. While Britain battens down the hatches against Omicron, and Nicola Sturgeon puts everyone into isolation cells, the E U’s Centre for Disease Prevention and Control reported, 1,780 confirmed cases of the Omicron variant in 57 countries worldwide. While Omicron ‘could’ become the dominant variant within weeks, and is more contagious than previous ones, it also produces milder symptoms. So, there are various differences of opinion, allowing the politics to kick in, causing more damage than the virus. Is it really wise to kick God into touch to be led solely by nuts? Of course, this does not describe every scientist or politician; there are some good men and women doing genuine, dedicated work in both areas. I include a link to one such scientist speaking on Covid treatment and vaccines. He is a Christian infectious disease specialist based at Alder Hey.[i] However, in a nutshell, this increasingly is not the case. When things go wrong, very conveniently it is God’s fault. When things are good it is because of human ingenuity and science. Let’s dig a little deeper.
For example
Climate “science” is not science since it ignores the scientific method. Because this is so, many genuine scientists reject the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Peer reviews are more like Pal reviews in science including medical science, and are often not worth the paper they are written on. Friends peer review one another’s work, which all helps the gravy-train of global warming to keep rolling the money in. Peer review in climate “science” in particular does not operate like peer review in other disciplines. In 2010, The American Physical Society went political in its revised statement on climate policy. Hal Lewis of the University of California, and the most eminent and senior member of the society, wrote a scathing letter of resignation. He wrote on the popular paradigm of human-induced climate change, stating: “It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.” A lot of what is published is incorrect containing error and poor work. In medicine, maybe half of what is published is untrue.[ii] Who would rather trust science than put their faith in God? Putting one’s faith in fraudulent science is to build your house on sand. Yet they neither inquire of God or seek for Him; they simply dismiss Him along with all that “religious stuff.” They don’t enquire about “the science,” yet they believe. They believe because they want to believe the lie rather than the truth. Last Christmas (2020) Parliament partied in Dodgy Downing Street while the rest of the nation was in lockdown. Sons and daughters were not even allowed to visit their sick and dying parents, but politicians and reporters could gulp down the wine in gay abandon during, allegedly, at least seven parties… which has been diluted down to just ‘impromptu drinks after work.’ These are the guys that are laying down the law for everyone but themselves to follow. Whilst the government is in Shockdown over the Christmas party revelations, they are all putting on a brave face, and pretence at being law-abiding citizens and responsible leaders.
There is a misconception, and many scientists build on it by promoting science as being pure, truthful, free from bias, and a noble quest for knowledge, and that fraud is the preserve of business people, crooks, and solicitors. Think again! Scientists are funded by the public to selfishly pursue their personal passion. It is said of many of them that they become narcissistic, incommunicative, and out of touch with those that dish-up the dollars in funding. While it is still a better place to live than much of the world, the West is becoming a nest and breeding ground for corruption at every level.
The peer review process is supposed to be the gold standard of science, but peer review depends upon the integrity of the editor. Editors have a great responsibility for the mis-information that goes out, and for the information that is withheld. Reviewers are not often diligent, and only review a paper if it’s by someone they know, and who will reciprocate by reviewing the reviewers work later on in the same journal. It’s game playing really.
Let us consider some of the madness contained in the sphere of human-induced climate change science. Back in 2017, two US academics had a peer-reviewed hoax paper published in a social science journal. I don’t set out to shock anyone, rather we should understand how appallingly ridiculous the ‘serious’ world of science can be. Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay argued that a penis is not in fact a male reproductive organ but merely a social construct, and that penises are responsible for causing climate change. “The conceptual penis as a social construct” had two peer reviewers who were allegedly experts in gender studies. One of the reviewers praised the way the paper captured “the issue of hypermasculinity through a multidimensional and nonlinear process”. The other reviewer marked it as “outstanding” in every applicable category.[iii]
Alarm bells should have sounded at the conclusion offered: “We conclude that penises are not best understood as a male sexual organ, or as a male reproductive organ, but instead as an enacted social construct that is both damaging and problematic for society and future generations. The conceptual penis presents significant problems for gender identity and reproductive identity within social and family dynamics, is exclusionary to disenfranchised communities based on gender or reproductive identity, is an enduring source of abuse for women and other gender-marginalized groups and individuals, is the universal performative source of rape and is the conceptual driver behind much of climate change.”
Some references in the paper cite a website for hoaxing journals – the Postmodern Generator, along with other fake journals and fictitious researchers. “We are following the science” is a mantra of politicians today. Once again, the blind are leading the blind in climate change, and in the political science of Covid. America’s Dr Anthony Fauci tells everyone to follow the science – Jesus says, Come, follow Me. We have choices to make. Fauci claims that any criticism of him is a criticism of science. He claims to speak for and represent “science.” If he is aware of the French research by senior French scientist, Dr Jacques Fantini, professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at the University of Aix-Marseille, he is not sharing it with the public. His key work was published in June 2021 with the title “Structural dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 variants: A health monitoring strategy for anticipating COVID-19 outbreaks.” The T value of Omicron is not exceptional, it is just 37% of the Delta value. Delta is 10.67, Omicron is 3.90% which is in line with pre-Delta variants. The spreading of the pandemic panic appears to be unnecessary.
There are actually many versions of science being followed, ridiculed and paid for by big pharma to get the desired result. “Follow the science” is behind the highly profitable ‘feardemic,’ and “Follow the Silence when science disagrees with profiteering.” There is a lot of political science being followed with the Covid vaccine and mad-mask-mandates, and there is a lot of silence concerning those scientists that disagree with the madding crowd and doom mongering scientists. We are in effect told – It is not yours to question why; it is yours to do and die; so once again we are being gagged with masks, and have the threat of Covic passports blowing in the wind. The government in America is promoting a vicious narrative against the unvaccinated, even wanting to shut down their ability to make a living. People are expected to make informed decisions to have the vaccine while the government is knowingly withholding data. This is political science – your choice in the matter is that you have no choice. If you turn to the left you live. If you turn to the right your living will be removed.
The revelation of God
People have said to me that we don’t need God in this modern age, we have got science. That conception is not immaculate; it is wrong. The truth is, science has got you! And, in most cases, it is false science.
In Daniel 5:18, Daniel explained to Belshazzar that, “the Most High God” had given his father, Nebuchadnezzar sovereignty and greatness and glory and splendour. It wasn’t Nebuchadnezzar that was magnificent, but he gave himself all the credit. God gave Nebuchadnezzar over to his madness (Daniel 5:20-21). Looking around at all that he had built and all that he had achieved, he thought he was God. His madness turned him into an animal until he eventually came to his senses (Daniel 4:34). The writing was already on the wall when Daniel spoke with Belshazzar (Daniel 5:5f), and the writing is on the wall for this age and this world. Belshazzar partied, not only drinking from the Temple of God’s gold goblets, he used them to toast his gods of gold and silver, bronze, iron, wood, and stone. Our world today is using what belongs to God for Godless purposes, including the worship of false gods.
How nutty is our present world? I read only this morning that under new ‘gender laws’ teachers might find themselves in Court if they tell children they cannot use opposite sex toilets. What are we doing to ourselves? What are we doing to our children? We are in danger of becoming animals in our behaviour. God is giving us over to a depraved mind because we have exchanged the truth of God for a lie. Humans have become futile in their thinking, and their hearts are darkened. There is a madness in certain leaders that want to rule the world, and they are building vast armies and weaponry. The psalmist tells us that “the earth is the Lord’s and everything in it (Psalm 24:1). If you are going to rule the world, you will have to topple the One thar rules from on high. Scripture points out that all things are created for God’s glory. We can see through the word of God that even nature itself glorifies God, yet so many are glorifying themselves and not God. Man/humanity is futile in his thinking and in his imagination. One man that escaped atheism and its belief system had studied various disciplines in science, and was convinced that Darwinism justified his atheism. His studies brought him to the conclusion that natural selection acting on random variation had put God out of a job. However, the man in question began to question his conclusions, and putting aside his prejudices he asked himself questions that he had never considered before. He relentlessly pursued the science and history instead of being limited simply to naturalism. He discovered that under careful scrutiny, the so-called facts of science simply crumbled. The foundation of Darwinism eroded along with his atheistic conclusions. After two years of intensive scientific research, he reached the conclusion that the data of the physical world points powerfully toward the existence of a Creator. This is a profound discovery by someone that was a convinced atheist. He tried to honestly consider which hypothesis—Darwinism or Design—best accounted for the most current data of science. The doctrine of Darwinism was simply too far-fetched to be credible. To accept Darwinism, he would have to believe that: Nothing produces everything. Non-life produces life. Randomness produces fine-tuning. Chaos produces information. Unconsciousness produces consciousness. Non-reason produces reason. Therefore, Darwinism would require a leap of faith to swallow its doctrine. Natural processes have utterly failed to explain how non-living chemicals could somehow self-assemble into the first living cell. The overall fossil record has consistently refused to confirm the grand claim of Darwinian transitions. Many experts state that, of the worlds forty phyla, the highest in the animal kingdom, virtually sprang forth with unique body plans. “The sudden appearance of these radically new life forms, devoid of prior transitions, has turned Darwin’s Tree of Life on its head.” His sincere search for truth led him to put his faith in God through Jesus Christ the Saviour. Not everyone has the ability to search out the scientific facts, but ‘anyone’ who sincerely seeks God will find him. God reveals Himself to those who seek Him; and God has provided humankind with a visual aid to encourage them to seek Him – “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made [that is, His creation], so that men are without excuse” (Romans 1:20). People say, if there is a God why doesn’t He do something? God is always doing something, and those with eyes to see, see it. Right now, God is showing the world that it is futile to put one’s faith in science. It is futile to put your trust in Humanity. God is showing the world through the massive build-up of arms in communist nations, that atheism destroys. God is showing us that it is atheism that is destroying the Western nations, and life as we have known it. This age is coming to an end, and only those in Christ will live in the presence of God through all eternity. Don’t be blown away by fake science and the “isms” of this world. Be gathered into God’s Kingdom through Jesus Christ. Jesus said: “If anyone is willing to do His [God’s] will, he will know about the teaching, whether it is of God, or I am speaking from Myself” (John 7:17). Are you willing to do God’s will?
It is said that before his death, Charles Darwin, returned to the Christianity of his youth, renouncing on his deathbed the theory of evolution. The story appears to have been authored by a “Lady Hope,” who was a fervent Christian and friend of Darwin’s wife. She prayed for and witnessed to Darwin all their married life, and relates how she visited him near the end and received his testimony. While it cannot be proved that Darwin did return to his faith in God, in his later years he did soften in his attitude toward Christianity. He even allowed a local church to hold their meetings on his property, had his bedroom windows opened so he could hear the hymns being sung. Return to the Lord – “Seek the Lord while He may be found; Call upon Him while He is near. Let the wicked forsake his way. And the unrighteous man his thoughts; And let him return to the Lord, And He will have compassion on him, And to our God, For He will abundantly pardon” (Isaiah 55:6-9).
“And you will seek Me and find Me when you search for Me with all your heart” (Jeremiah 29:13
Blessings and shalom
Malcolm [10.12.2021]
[i] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bo5bLw7TbIA
[ii] R. Horton, 2015: Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma? The Lancet 385: 1380.
[iii] Peter Boyle and Jamie Lindsay, 2017: The conceptual penis as a social construct. Cogent Social Sciences 2017,3: 1330439.
